The Bombing of the Dome of the Rock, its consequences, Albert Pike's letter my comprehension through a decade, General Clarke and 9/11, Israeli involvement in everything
- Gerar link
- X
- Outros aplicativos
- he REALLY was serious about his prediction of the bombing of the Al Aqsa mosque. Did he give any time limits? He said that if he is not right about this one then we should disregard Everything else he says.
He's betting everything on this one.
Why is he so sure?
In the video Game #12: The Law of Eschatological Convergence he explains why.- He mentions the rabbi basically just saying it outright,
- The rabbi says the war with Iran is an opportunity to Bomb the Al Aqsa mosque and Blame it on Iran, so that sunnis and shias will fight between them because of this
- We know that the israelis already have tunnels under the Al Aqsa Mosque.
- based on their religious views they want to build the Third Temple, in order to invoke their Messiah
Catastrophic consequences on World Politics:
As we said this would have HUGE significance religiously for all abrahamic religions. This would mean:- The jews would start to build the Third Temple
- Muslims of the whole world will be very angry because the Dome of the Rock is a holy site Built by Caliph Abd al-Malik in 691–692 CE to protect the "Noble Rock" from which Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) is believed to have ascended to heaven.
- Jews believe that when the Third Temple is built their Messiah will appear and he will reign over the whole world
- Zionist christians will support the jews in bringing the jewish Messiah(?) and building the 3rd Temple, this could generate a huge conflict between zionists and muslims, just like described in the letter by Albert Pike in 1871
Renaissance — 22/03/2026 02:57
ive wondered for some time, if the Al-Aqsa mosque was destroyed would muslims (esp muslim nations) do anything more then condemn the actions of Iran/Israel? also who would they pin it on?PekkaAP — 22/03/2026 03:04
Difference between the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock
Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock are two distinct, sacred structures located within the 144,000-square-meter Al-Haram al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary) in Jerusalem's Old City. The Dome of the Rock is the gold-domed shrine, while Al-Aqsa (often referring to the silver-domed Qibli Mosque) is the third holiest site in Islam, where Prophet Muhammad is believed to have led prayers, notes this Facebook post and this YouTube video.Key Differences and Details:
- Dome of the Rock (Qubbat aṣ-Ṣaḫra): Completed in 691–692 CE by Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik, it is the oldest surviving Islamic monument. It covers the Foundation Stone, from which Muslims believe Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven (Mi'raj).
- Al-Aqsa Mosque (Al-Masjid al-Qibli): Often mistakenly identified as just the grey-domed building, it represents the entire fenced sanctuary. It is a site of daily prayer and holds profound significance in Islamic history.
- The rabbi said they would blame it on Iran so that shias and sunnis will fight among themselves
- Would the Muslim nations take any real measures in retaliation? That's a good question. It could depend on how much control the js have on Muslim media and politics.
- Netanyahu's arguments to prove Iran is a threat to the whole world:
- Iran targeted a civilians area
- (Israel did it most likely)
- Iran almost hit the Al aqsa mosque
- (Israel did it to blame it on Iran and build the third temple as prof Jiang described)
- Iran hit Diego Garcia island with an intercontinental missile which proves they can hit deep inside Europe
- (Israel did it to blame Iran and bring European nations into the war just like in pike's letter)
- Iran's blocking the international energy pathway which will affect the global economy
- ( Iran's actually doing this most likely)
Why I believe Albert Pike's letter is real
It must be said about the Alber Pike's letter: I read this letter about 10 years ago. At the time it seemed plausible but there was something that didn't quite fit I didn't understand at the time how WW3 would be cause the "The differences between the Zionists and the Islamic nations"My comprehension of Pike's Letter as 10 years passed
His explanations for WW1 and WW2 checked out but the explanation for WW3 didn't really make sense to me or to any of the analysts and theorists that I listened to. At the time this is what I saw: Yes, there are differences between the Zionists and the Islamics, like we can see in Palestine. But this conflict has been going on for a long time and it still hasn't caused no World War, and it really doesn't look it will. Actually no one cares too much about the Palestinians besides Iran that helps through Hezbollah" Not only that but the nations from general Clarke's list are falling one after the other without much resistance. So why would a world war occur as a result of this? Seems unlikely.... That's what I thought.- If we're going back in time let's say almost 10 years ago, the context also is that the "Zionist nations" also known as the US and Europe were fighting Syria. At the time I wasnt following politics as much but I remember the massive coordinated media campaign to smear Assad, they argued that Assad used Sarin gas bombs ON HIS OWN PEOPLE, which I found to be completely ridiculous at the time. I thought it was a Psyop and I still do. They had overthrown Lybia and Iraq. Just as described by General Clarke.
General Clarke, 9/11 and the plan to overthrow "7 countries", since 2001
General Clarke from the Us Army said that after 9/11 he was informed that the United States had a plan of overthrowing 7 countries in the Middle East:- Iraq
- Syria
- Lebanon
- Lybia
- Sudan
- Somalia
- Iran
- He did say he didn't understand the reason. The man who gave him the information said: " well we have a good military and when the only tool you have is a hammer every problem has to look like a nail" Neither of them knew the reason for the imminent invasion of Iraq, since the ones who allegedly were responsible for the 9/11 attacks were Saudis, and they know this because, supposedly, they found the passports of the terrorists among the debris. Which is absolutely ridiculous and impossible. And we know that really those passports are fake evidence put there by the real planners of the attacks: The Israelis.
Israelis were responsible for the 9/11 attacks
But I can talk more about how the Israelis were responsible for 9/11 in another occasion. The fact of the matter is we have enough evidence to believe they were the ones responsible for the attacks as you might already be aware, as Prof Jiang is definitely aware as he has already pointed out before. Making some references to Lucky Larry Silverstein.PekkaAP — 23/03/2026 11:02
So what has changed in my perception of the Albert Pike letter? Ever since the start of the first Epstein war, also known as Operation Epic Fury earlier this year things became much clearer, as if now all of a sudden all the pieces fit Iran has always been the largest, strongest nation of the Muslim world. Beforehand I wasn't aware of Iran, it's culture, it's economy, it's religion, it's people, it's political organization, their history, their revolution, their energy, their science. Also very important I didn't know about the importance of their influence in the area in what regards to energy. What we're seeing is that Iran is different from the GCC nations in that, Iran is a sovereign nation with real military capabilities.PekkaAP — 23/03/2026 14:00
EncaminhadaThat's what I always thought as well, but with Iran we're seeing that things are very different. What we're seeing is Iran holds under its wings some very important pillars of global trade like the international supply of oil, you might argue the GCC is under the zionist's control, but Iran has been bombing Saudi Aramco, and the GCC has been left vulnerable. This whole thing feels very much fabricated, as if they're doing it on purpose to collapse the global economy and cause a global conflict
Comentários
Postar um comentário